Methods and systems for employing artificial intelligence in automated orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning

ABSTRACT

A method for treating an orthodontic condition can include receiving patient data, such as through a website, accessing a database having information derived from patient treatments, generating a model of an orthodontic condition defining one or more anatomic features of a set of teeth, identifying a diagnosis of an orthodontic condition and identifying a treatment regimen for the diagnosis. A method can include tagging an anatomic feature with an electronic identifier and automatically generating a tooth setup. A system can include a server and a database, which can include information relating to patient treatments, and a website for receiving patient data. A system can include an electronic model representing anatomic features of a patient&#39;s teeth and an application adapted to identify a diagnosis and a treatment regimen for an orthodontic condition, which can include executing artificial intelligence and/or other algorithms.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The field of the present invention generally relates to methods and systems that may be used to diagnose an orthodontic condition. More particularly, the field of the present invention relates to methods and systems for automatically diagnosing, and proposing a treatment for, an orthodontic condition, which methods and systems employ the use of artificial intelligence capabilities.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Many systems and methods have been developed or, more typically, envisioned which, hypothetically, could automate the capture of patient data and diagnosis of an orthodontic condition. These actual (or contemplated) systems employ certain components and subsystems that may automate the capture of patient data (such as orthodontic images or scans), the transfer of such data to an orthodontist, and/or even the interpretation of such data (or, more typically, discrete portions of such data). However, the currently-available methods and systems fail to comprise an ability to make decisions based on interpreted data, in an automated fashion. In other words, the currently-available methods and systems do not comprise an effective, accurate, and efficient “artificial intelligence” capability, in the automated diagnosis and treatment of an orthodontic condition.

The present invention addresses these shortcomings of the currently-available systems for automated orthodontic diagnosis and treatment.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A method for diagnosing and identifying a treatment for an orthodontic condition can include receiving patient data regarding an orthodontic condition, accessing a database, such as a database that comprises or has access to information derived from one or more patient treatments, and generating or otherwise building a model of an orthodontic condition, which can include defining one or more anatomic features of a set of teeth. A method can include analyzing patient data, identifying at least one diagnosis of an orthodontic condition, such as based on information derived from patient treatments, and executing one or more algorithms, such as an artificial intelligence algorithm, based on an input, which can include one or more inputs derived from information derived from a patient treatment. A method can include identifying at least one treatment regimen for a diagnosis, which can include identifying or otherwise outputting at least one of a treatment approach, a corrective appliance and a combination thereof, in whole or in part. A method can include instructing a computer or other software program to perform one or more method steps. A method can include tagging or otherwise designating one or more anatomic features of teeth with an electronic identifier, such as an identifier generated by an algorithm, an identifier defined by a user, a combination thereof, or another identifier. An anatomic feature of a tooth can include any of incisal edges, cusp tips, occlusal fossa, points of maximum crown convexity, marginal ridges, interproximal contact points, interocclusal contact points, interdental papilla heights, marginal gingival lines, zones of attached gingiva and combinations thereof.

A method can include aligning or otherwise disposing or moving one or more anatomic features, which can include aligning one or more anatomic features based on a pattern, such as a pattern representing a target or other orthodontic condition, which can be or include at least one of an ideal condition, an acceptable condition, such as a condition based on one or more previously successful patient treatments, other conditions, and a combination thereof. A method can include aligning one or more anatomic features in one or more ways, which can include disposing one or more anatomic feature identifiers along or otherwise relative to a curve, a spline, one or more additional anatomic feature identifiers, or other references, such as within a model. A method can include aligning one or more anatomic features on an arch relative to one or more anatomic features on another arch, or on the same arch.

A method can include transmitting, receiving or otherwise communicating data, such as patient data, treatment data or other data, through or via a website, which can include transmitting, receiving or otherwise communicating data to and/or from a server or other computer(s), directly, indirectly or otherwise. One or more databases can include and/or have access to treatment data, such as patient treatment information or other information, which can include information from at least one of textbooks, scientific literature, results derived from ongoing patient treatments, results derived from completed patient treatments and a combination thereof. A method can include estimating, assigning or otherwise identifying a probability value associated with one or more diagnoses, such as a probability value that can represent a likelihood that one or more diagnoses are accurate.

A system for diagnosing and identifying a treatment for an orthodontic condition can include one or more servers, which can be adapted to receive, transmit or otherwise process or communicate data, such as patient data, treatment data or other information. A system can include one or more databases, which can include and/or have access to information relating to patient treatments. A system can include one or more electronic models of one or more orthodontic condition, such as a model that defines or otherwise represents one or more anatomic features of a set of teeth. A system can include one or more computer, software or other programs or applications, which can be housed within and/or accessible by a server, database or other system component. A system application or other component can be adapted to analyze information, such as patient data and data relating to one or more patient treatments, and to estimate or otherwise identify one or more diagnoses of an orthodontic condition. A system can include an application or other component adapted to execute one or more algorithms, such as artificial intelligence and/or other algorithms, which can include being adapted to execute algorithms based on one or more inputs, such as inputs derived from or otherwise based on patient treatments, the results of patient treatments or other information. A system application or other component can be adapted to recommend or otherwise identify one or more treatment regimens for one or more diagnoses, such as a treatment approach or other method, a corrective appliance, or a combination thereof. Alternatively, or collectively, a system application or other component can be adapted to recommend or otherwise identify one or more treatment regimens that may not be appropriate, suitable or otherwise applicable for one or more diagnoses.

A system can include one or more identifiers for an anatomic feature of a tooth or set of teeth, which can include one or more electronic identifiers for one or more anatomic features, such as identifiers generated by an algorithm, identifiers defined by a user, identifiers otherwise defined or existing in a system application, or a combination thereof. A system can include one or more identifiers for any anatomic feature of a tooth or set of teeth, such as incisal edges, cusp tips, occlusal fossa, points of maximum crown convexity, marginal ridges, interproximal contact points, interocclusal contact points, interdental papilla heights, marginal gingival lines and zones of attached gingiva, separately or in combination, in whole or in part. A system application or other component can be adapted to align or otherwise dispose one or more anatomic features or identifiers to, from, between or otherwise among one or more positions, which can include manipulating one or more anatomic features relative to one another, relative to or otherwise based on a pattern, such as a template representing a target orthodontic condition, along or otherwise relative to a curve, spline, or other shape, or relative to one or more other anatomic features, such as features defined or within a model, separately or in combination, in whole or in part.

A system can include one or more websites, such as a website adapted to receive or otherwise process patient data or other input, and one or more servers, such as a server adapted to communicate with one or more other system components, which can include being adapted to receive, transmit or otherwise process patient data or other information, such as information from, to or through one or more websites. One or more websites can be hosted on one or more servers within a system. A system can include one or more databases that can include and/or have access to patient treatment information and/or other information, such as information from or otherwise based on textbooks, scientific literature, results of ongoing patient treatments, or results of completed patient treatments, separately or in combination, in whole or in part. A system can include an application or other component adapted to estimate, assign or otherwise identify a probability value associated with one or more diagnoses, such as a probability value that can represent a likelihood that one or more diagnoses are accurate.

A computer readable medium can have instructions stored thereon that, when executed by a processor, can cause the processor to perform one or more of the methods of the present disclosure, separately or in combination, in whole or in part. A computer readable medium can have instructions stored thereon that, when executed by a processor, can cause the processor to perform a method that can include receiving data regarding an orthodontic or other condition, such as on or by one or more servers, accessing or otherwise communicating with a database, such as a database comprising or having access to treatment or other patient information, generating a model, such as an electronic or electronically stored model, of one or more orthodontic conditions, defining one or more anatomic features of a tooth or set of teeth, analyzing patient or other data, identifying one or more diagnoses of an orthodontic condition, executing one or more algorithms, such as artificial intelligence or other algorithms, processing one or more inputs, such as input derived from patient treatments, and identifying one or more treatment regimens for one or more diagnoses, such as a treatment regimen including at least one of a treatment approach, a corrective appliance and a combination thereof.

The above-mentioned and additional features of the present invention are further illustrated in the Detailed Description contained herein.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1: a diagram illustrating the general steps and processes encompassed by the present invention, namely, the generation of patient data, the analysis of such data by one or more servers, and the automated diagnosis of an orthodontic condition and the proposed treatment approaches therefor.

FIG. 2: a diagram illustrating the various components of the systems described herein, namely, the centralized website, server, and database described herein.

FIG. 3: a table summarizing the results of a root tip analysis of a patient.

FIG. 4: a table summarizing the results of a tooth torque analysis of a patient.

FIG. 5: a table summarizing the results of an arch length analysis of a patient.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The following will describe, in detail, several preferred embodiments of the present invention. These embodiments are provided by way of explanation only, and thus, should not unduly restrict the scope of the invention. In fact, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate upon reading the present specification and viewing the present drawings that the invention teaches many variations and modifications, and that numerous variations of the invention may be employed, used, and made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.

Referring to FIG. 1, according to certain embodiments of the present invention, automated diagnosis of an orthodontic condition begins with the production of patient-specific data, which may comprise patient photographs 2, study models 4, radiographs 6, and/or combinations thereof. The types of data captured for a particular patient may be the same for all patients, or may be customized for each patient. The “orthodontic condition,” referenced herein, may generally comprise an arrangement of a patient's teeth that is undesirable according to applicable orthodontic standards, whereby such arrangement may be undesirable for medical, orthodontic, aesthetic, and other reasons. Examples of such orthodontic conditions include, but are not limited to, overbites, crossbites, openbites, overjets, underbites, and the like.

These patient data may then be provided to a server 8 through a centralized website 10. Referring to FIG. 2, such data may be provided to the server 8 vis-à-vis an on-line form (within a centralized website 10) through which the data may be uploaded and transferred to the server 8, or through a constant data feed through a standard Internet connection. As described herein, the server 8 will preferably comprise certain tools 12 for analysis and interpretation of such data—and for making intelligent and probabilistic diagnosis and proposed treatments for an orthodontic condition.

The invention provides that the server 8 will preferably be capable of communicating with at least one database 14 (or group of databases). The database 14 will preferably store and/or have access to knowledge and information derived from scientific, medical, and orthodontic textbooks and literature 16. More particularly, the invention provides that a single database 14 may store all of such information—or, alternatively, it may store portions of such information and the server 8 may have access to additional information that may be stored within other databases.

According to certain preferred embodiments, the invention will preferably employ a systematic approach to evaluating the strength of scientific evidence that may be retrieved from the database 14 described herein, for the purpose of diagnosing an orthodontic condition (as described below). For example, the server 8 may consider the quality, quantity and consistency of the evidence to derive a grade or confidence level of the available knowledge. The invention provides that various criteria, such as indirect supporting evidence, may be taken into account in assessing the strength of each piece of scientific evidence. The scientific evidence may then be ranked, based on the grade levels (or confidence levels) assigned thereto.

More particularly, for example, the invention may consider the strongest evidence (i.e., evidence of higher grade levels) being derived from at least one systematic review of one or more well-designed and randomized controlled trials. The invention provides that a second highest grade may be assigned to, for example, evidence derived from at least one properly designed randomized controlled trial, which involved an appropriate sample size and statistical power. The invention further provides that a third highest grade may be assigned to evidence derived from well-designed trials, without randomization; a single group pre-post, cohort, time series study; or matched case-controlled studies. Still further, the invention provides that a fourth grade may be assigned to evidence from well-designed, non-experimental studies, carried out by more than one center or research group. A fifth and lowest grade of evidence may consist of opinions of respected authorities (which are based on clinical evidence), and/or descriptive studies or reports of expert committees.

The invention provides that the database 14 will further comprise, or have access to, information that represents dynamic results from ongoing and previously completed orthodontic studies 18. Preferably, these dynamic results 18 will be organized by orthodontic condition, such that the most relevant information may be retrieved as quickly as possible, within the database 14. Similar to the information derived from scientific, medical, and orthodontic textbooks and literature 16, the invention provides that all of the dynamic results 18 may be stored within the database 14 or, alternatively, portions thereof may be stored within the database 14 and other dynamic results 18 may be retrieved, as needed, from third party databases.

Upon providing the server 8 with the patient data, e.g., patient photographs 2, study models 4, radiographs 6, and/or combinations thereof, a user may instruct the server 8 to conduct an automated diagnosis. The automated diagnosis will be based upon the patient data, the information derived from scientific textbooks and literature 16, and dynamic results from ongoing and previously completed orthodontic studies 18. The server 8 will preferably employ the use of logic-based rules and decision trees 20 to diagnose an orthodontic condition based on all of such information. The invention provides that the server 8 will preferably express the diagnosis by identifying one or more orthodontic conditions, along with a probability value for each orthodontic condition. According to such embodiments, the probability value would represent the relative probability that the diagnosis is accurate.

Still further, the server 8 will be configured to output (recommend) one or more treatment approaches and/or corrective orthodontic appliances 22. More particularly, for each diagnosis 20 identified by the server 8, the server 8 will propose one or more treatment approaches, corrective appliances, or combinations thereof 22. The invention provides that each such proposed treatment approach and corrective appliance will be correlated with a probability value. The invention provides that this probability value will represent the probability of the proposed treatment approach and/or appliance correcting the diagnosed orthodontic condition.

The invention further provides that a user may input patient preferences 24 and/or orthodontist-specified preferences to the server 8 (through the centralized website 10). For example, the invention provides that a patient may filter the proposed treatments and corrective appliance results 26 based on cost, or the relative aesthetics of an appliance. Similarly, an orthodontist may filter the proposed treatments and corrective appliance results 26 based on his/her bias—e.g., an orthodontist may instruct the server 8 to only consider, or to not consider, a certain type of corrective appliance. Upon completion of the foregoing process, the server may be instructed to generate a report 28, which preferably summarizes the patient data, the diagnoses and associated probability values, the proposed treatment approaches and/or corrective devices (and the probability values associated therewith), and any patient and orthodontist preferences that were considered during the analysis.

According to certain embodiments, the invention provides that the server 8 is configured to analyze the patient data by identifying a location and position of a plurality of teeth in the patient data in two-dimensional space or, even more preferably, in three-dimensional space (provided that the type and amount of patient data provided to the server 8 is sufficient to do so). The invention provides that the server 8 may be configured to undertake this analysis automatically or, according to certain embodiments, the centralized website 10 will provide users with certain on-line tools to specify the location and position of the plurality of teeth in the patient data. For example, such on-line tools may be used to identify, within the patient data, the location and position of a patient's incisors, canines, premolars and molars, as shown within the patient data that has been provided to the server 8. The location, position, contours, and size of the plurality of teeth may be mapped out by such user within the centralized website 10, while the user is viewing the patient data that has been uploaded to the server 8, e.g., using a graphics tool that allows a user to, for example, approximately trace or identify the outer boundaries of each tooth.

According to such embodiments, the server 8 may be further configured to assign coordinates to each tooth within the plurality of teeth. The invention provides that such coordinates are preferably correlated to the location and position of each tooth, as automatically determined by the server (or as otherwise identified by a clinician, using the on-line patient data analysis tools, described above). According to these embodiments, the invention provides that the coordinates for each of the plurality of teeth may then be compared (by the server 8) to a table contained within the database 14. The table will preferably comprise a series of diagnostic data sets, with each diagnostic data set comprising coordinates, or a range of coordinates, which are correlated with (1) a known location and position of a plurality of teeth and (2) a previously diagnosed orthodontic condition (which previous diagnoses are derived from (a) information derived from textbooks and scientific literature and (b) dynamic results derived from ongoing and completed patient treatments).

According to such embodiments, the server 8 may then be instructed to identify a diagnostic data set contained within the database 14 that represents a statistical “best fit,” or most closely resembles, the coordinates for the plurality of teeth of the patient. At this point, the server 8 may be instructed to diagnosis the orthodontic condition based on the “best fit” diagnostic data set that it identified. As mentioned above, the server 8 may further assign a probability value to this diagnosis. The probability value will preferably be based, at least in part, on a confidence level that has been assigned to the diagnostic data set which the server identifies as the statistical best fit for the coordinates for the plurality of teeth of the patient. This confidence level will preferably be influenced by the grade level that is assigned to the evidence that supports a connection between the orthodontic condition that is correlated with the particular diagnostic data set, as described above.

According to certain embodiments, the server 8 or, more particularly, the computer program housed therein, may be instructed to identify at least one treatment approach, a corrective appliance, or a combination thereof for the at least one diagnosis that is derived from the patient's data. This step may be carried by, for example, instructing the server 8 to calculate a set of target coordinates, which represent a desired and corrected location and position of each tooth in the plurality of teeth of the patient. Based on the target coordinates, the current location and position coordinates of the patient's teeth, and the diagnosed orthodontic position, the server 8 may be instructed to identify at least one treatment approach, a corrective appliance, or a combination thereof, which will be effective to reorient the plurality of teeth towards the location and position represented by the target coordinates. The server 8 may further be instructed to calculate a probability value that is correlated with a relative likelihood of the at least one treatment approach, corrective appliance, or a combination thereof, being effective to reorient the plurality of teeth to a location and position represented by the target coordinates.

According to certain preferred embodiments, the invention will preferably employ certain additional algorithms in analyzing patient data, diagnosing orthodontic conditions and probability values therefor, and proposing treatment approaches and corrective appliances (and probability values therefor). By way of illustration, as mentioned above, the server 8 may be configured to assign greater value (weight) to existing scientific and medical knowledge, relative to dynamic results from ongoing and completed treatments—when diagnosing and providing recommended treatment protocols for patients. The following will describe certain non-limiting examples of algorithms, which may be employed in the processes and systems of the present invention.

The invention provides that artificial intelligence algorithms will preferably be employed in order to create an artificial neural network, which will enable the server to perform the orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognostication steps described herein. The algorithms may utilize statistical estimation, optimization and control theory methodology, or combinations thereof. In the case of statistical estimation methods, estimators and estimation methods that may be employed include, but are not limited to, the following: maximum likelihood estimators, Bayes estimators, method of moments estimators, Cramer-Rao bound, minimum mean squared error (also known as Bayes least squared error), maximum a posteriori, minimum variance unbiased estimator, best linear unbiased estimator, unbiased estimators, particle filter, Markov chain Monte Carlo, Kalman filter, Ensemble Kalman filter, and Wiener filter. The statistical optimization techniques that may be utilized include single-variable optimizations or, more preferably, multi-variable optimization techniques. The statistical optimization methods may include, but are not limited to, the following: Bundle methods, Conjugate gradient method, Ellipsoid method, Frank-Wolfe method, Gradient descent (also known as steepest descent or steepest ascent), Interior point methods, Line search, Nelder-Mead method, Newton's method, Quasi-Newton methods, Simplex method and Subgradient method.

Because the systems and methods of the present invention involve certain input provided by users of the invention, the systems and methods are dynamic. As such, the invention provides that algorithms that employ control theory may be employed to solve problems in connection with the orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognostication steps described herein. Non-limiting examples of such control theory methods include: Adaptive control, Hierarchical control, Intelligent control, Optimal control, Robust control and Stochastic control.

EXAMPLES Example of Optimization Algorithm for Decision Making in Diagnosis and Treatment Planning

An important aspect of multiple optimization is the handling of human preferences, such as the type of cost- and aesthetic-related preferences that a patient or orthodontist may provide to the system described herein. Although selection or prioritizing alternatives from a set of available options with respect to multiple criteria termed Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) is an effective optimization approach, in practical applications, alternative ratings and criteria weights can not always be precisely assessed due to unquantifiable, incomplete, and/or unobtainable information—or because of a lack of knowledge that may cause subjectiveness and vagueness in decision performance. As such, the invention provides that the application of fuzzy set theory to MCDM models provides an effective solution for dealing with subjectiveness and vagueness commonly found with clinical information. In such embodiments, the invention provides that human preferences—from both patient and clinician—may be assigned “utility values” in which a scaled real number is assigned to indicate its relative importance. The resulting weighting vector, which evaluates criteria of decision making, is then provided in fuzzy linguistic terms such as very poor, poor, fair, good, and very good.

Example of Decision Tree Algorithm for Decision Making in Diagnosis and Treatment Planning.

The invention provides that a decision tree method referred to as “C4.5,” which allows for input of continuous numerical data, is preferably employed in the methods and systems described herein. The invention provides that, under this approach, a decision tree may be “learned” vis-à-vis splitting a source set into subsets, based on an attribute value test. The invention provides that this process may be repeated on each derived subset in a recursive manner, which is completed when the subset (at a node) has the same value of the target variable, or when splitting no longer adds value to predictions. According to this embodiment, decision trees are used for relatively simpler functions as decision-tree learners create over-complex trees (overfitting), although pruning may, optionally, be performed to minimize this problem. In addition, concepts that are relatively more difficult to learn are not easily expressed by decision trees—and, in such case, more advanced algorithms will be implemented in the systems and methods described herein.

Example of Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) and Variants Thereof.

The invention provides that POMDPs are preferably used in the clinical applications described herein, particularly for decisions that are made based on incomplete information. The invention provides that POMDPs are preferably advantageous insofar as they facilitate the combination of patient data, e.g., patient data derived from examination, photographs, radiographs and any other diagnostic aids—as well as the current state of knowledge of the cause-and-effect representation from these data and measurements. The invention provides that feature selection may be performed using pattern recognition techniques and, furthermore, the treatment decisions with which to restore the patient to a more desirable or ideal state are produced.

Patient Example

The following example describes the application of the processes described herein to a patient in need of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment. The process begins with the patient undergoing cephalometric radiographic analysis. The data generated by such analysis are presented in the table below.

Measurement Patient SNA (degrees) 82° SNB (degrees) 74° ANB (degrees)  8° Maxillary incisor to NA (degrees) 22° Maxillary incisor to NA (millimeters) 6 mm Mandibular incisor to NB (degrees) 24° Mandibular incisor to NB (millimeters) 4 mm Pogonion to NB (millimeters) 4 mm Maxillary incisor to Mandibular incisor (degrees) 140°  Occlusal plane to SN (degrees) 15° Go-Gn to SN (degrees) 32° Mandibular incisor to MP (degrees) 86°

Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the cephalometric radiographic analysis may be performed to capture measurements, other than those specified above. However, the measurements summarized in the table above are often important to any orthodontic diagnosis. Next, the patient's dentition may be analyzed and measured. The table below provides a summary of the results of such analysis and, specifically, the analysis of the patient's anteroposterior and vertical movements.

Right Right Left Left Molar Canine Midline Canine Molar Anteroposterior Movements (mm) Maxilla 1.5 mm left 1.0 distal Mandible 3 mesial 2.5 mesial 0.5 mm left 2 mesial 3 mesial Vertical Movements (mm) Maxilla 1.5 mm 2.0 mm occlusal occlusal Mandible Curve of Spee (mm) Maxilla Mandible 3 mm

The diagnostic process of this Example further entails the following analyses of the patient: (1) a root tip analysis (results are summarized in FIG. 3); (2) a tooth torque analysis (results are summarized in FIG. 4); (3) an arch length analysis (results are summarized in FIG. 5); and (4) a Bolton analysis (the results of which are summarized in the table below).

Bolton Analysis (Millimeters) Anterior (Bolton 6) mm Posterior (Bolton 12) mm Maxilla 2 mm deficient 2 mm deficient Mandible

The invention provides that a series of image analyses may then be performed, namely, an image analysis of a patient's frontal and profile planes. The results captured in this Example are summarized in the tables below.

Frontal Analysis Parameter Results Upper Third Within normal limits Middle Third Within normal limits Lower Third Decreased Maxillary Lip Within normal limits Mandibular Lip Within normal limits Smile Within normal limits Gingival Display Within normal limits Symmetry Within normal limits

Profile Analysis Parameter Results Profile Convex Maxillary lip to E plane 1 mm Lip strain Yes Lip competence Incompetent

As explained above, the invention provides that a patient and/or clinician (dentist or orthodontist) may specify certain additional criteria, which the server will consider in calculating a diagnosis and treatment plan. The table below provides the criteria selected by the patient in this Example.

Patient Preferences Priority Parameter (Scale of 1-10 for Importance) Facial Aesthetics 9 Comfort 2 Treatment Time 7 Removable Appliances 1 Aesthetic Braces 2 Orthognathic Surgery 1 Cost 5

The foregoing patient data, measurements, and preferences are subsequently provided to the server, via the centralized website described herein. Using one or more artificial intelligence algorithms, such as the algorithms described herein (or combinations thereof), as well as (i) information derived from textbooks and scientific literature and (ii) dynamic results derived from ongoing and completed patient treatments, the server calculates one or more diagnoses for the patient, along with an associated probability value (which is indicative of the relative accuracy of each diagnosis). Three diagnoses, and associated probability values, for this Example are listed below.

-   -   Diagnosis One: Class II Malocclusion (85%)     -   Diagnosis Two: Class I Malocclusion (14%)     -   Diagnosis Three: Class III Malocclusion (1%)

In addition, based on the foregoing patient data, measurements, preferences, information, and diagnoses, the server calculates one or more proposed treatment regimens for the patient, along with a probability value that is correlated with a relative likelihood of the relevant treatment approach, corrective appliance, or a combination thereof, being effective to reorient the patient's teeth to the desired location and position. The list of proposed treatment regimens, and corresponding probability values, calculated in this Example is provided below.

-   -   Growth Modification (61%)     -   Mandibular Extractions (72%)     -   Maxillary Extractions (58%)     -   Removable Appliances (8%)     -   Fixed Appliances (92%)     -   Retainers (99%)

In this Example, the server further calculated the average probably treatment time to be about 26.5 months.

In at least one embodiment, patient data can include anatomic information regarding one or more teeth, such as information regarding an anatomic feature(s) of one or more teeth in a set of teeth (e.g., a full set or a partial set). Examples of such anatomic features can include incisal edges, cusp tips, occlusal fossa, points of maximum crown convexity, marginal ridges, interproximal contact points, interocclusal contact points, interdental papilla heights, marginal gingival lines and zones of attached gingiva, among others, separately or in combination, in whole or in part. The anatomic information or data can be provided or stored in any manner according to a particular application, which can include being stored within database 14 or otherwise disposed for communication with server 8, such as by way of a website (which can be hosted on server 8 or elsewhere), peer-to-peer computer connection, File Transfer Protocol (FTP), direct device-to-computer connection or other communication system, such as an indirect, wired, wireless or other system, separately or in combination. In at least one embodiment, anatomic data can include one or more tags, such as electronic tags or other electronic identifiers, assigned to anatomic features of a patient's teeth for defining a location or other attribute thereof (e.g., within a 2D or 3D model). The tags can be assigned in any manner according to a particular application, such as manually, automatically or otherwise. For example, one or more tags can be applied by a user, such as by way of numerical or other inputs provided manually or in another manner. In at least one embodiment, tags can be provided through a Graphical User Interface (GUI), such as a GUI provided on a website (if present), which can, but need not, include point-and-click input capabilities. Alternatively, or collectively, tags can be defined by one or more algorithms executed by a processor, such as a processor running software associated with server 8 and/or database 14.

One or more computer models can be generated based on the tags and/or other anatomic information, whether separately or in combination with one another or with one or more of the other types of data discussed elsewhere herein. For example, an electronically stored model, such as an electronic virtual treatment model or automated tooth setup, of an orthodontic condition or malocclusion can be produced based on the anatomic and/or other data and one or more algorithms (e.g., the artificial intelligence and other algorithm described herein) can be executed to calculate a proposed treatment regimens (e.g., approaches, appliances, etc.) for improving the malocclusion represented by the model(s). In at least one embodiment, two or more models can be wholly or partially compared, such as by comparing a virtual treatment model to a target model representing a corrected or improved set of teeth, and a proposed treatment regimen can include one or more recommendations for transforming at least a portion of the virtual treatment model into a corresponding portion of the target model. A target model can include, for example, a model representing a visual treatment objective (VTO), a surgical treatment objective (STO), or another objective, separately or in combination, in whole or in part.

In at least one embodiment, the tags and/or other anatomic information (separately or in combination with other data) can be used to align one or more anatomic features within a model relative to one another and/or relative to a pattern or other target configuration. For example, a tag or set of tags corresponding to an orthodontic condition can be arranged, rearranged or otherwise processed (e.g., via one or more algorithms) to follow a pattern based on known information, such as a pattern established historically. A historic pattern or other configurations can be or include, e.g., an ideal configuration, an improved configuration or another configurations, such as an arrangement based on a consensus of previous, successful patient treatments. Such configurations can be based on any number of factors according to a particular application; for instance, an ideal or improved configuration can be based on medical opinion, patient opinion, opinions regarding aesthetics, or other considerations, such as one or more of the factors described elsewhere in the present disclosure, separately or in combination, in whole or in part.

As other examples, the systems and methods of the present disclosure can line up incisal edges and cusp tips along a curve, such as a U-shaped or otherwise-shaped curve (whether symmetrical or asymmetrical), align marginal ridges relative to a spline, arrange (e.g., using tags) anatomic features on an arch relative to anatomic features on another arch, such as an opposing arch, or on the same arc, or both. Of course, the foregoing examples are for illustrative purposes and alternatively, or collectively, the systems and methods of the present disclosure can arrange any anatomic or other feature (in any number) associated with teeth relative to or otherwise in view of any other feature, reference point or location. Additionally, in at least one embodiment of Applicant's disclosure, one or more of the artificial intelligence and other algorithms disclosed herein can cooperate with the various components and inputs described above to automatically develop one or more routines and/or algorithms for correcting, improving or otherwise changing a malocclusion or other orthodontic condition according to an electronically stored model, such as an electronic virtual treatment model or automated tooth setup. Further, such routines and/or algorithms can change or otherwise affect one or more outputs over time, such as, for example, by providing progressively more accurate or effective proposed treatment regimens based on prior treatment regimens and results achieved by the prior treatment regimens.

According to certain aspects of the present invention, methods and systems for diagnosing and identifying a treatment for an orthodontic condition are provided. Such methods and systems generally can comprise the use of a server on which a centralized website can be hosted. The server can be configured to receive patient data through the website, with such patient data comprising patient photographs, study models, radiographs, and/or combinations thereof. The methods and systems can comprise the use of a database that includes or has access to information derived from, e.g., textbooks and scientific literature and results of ongoing and/or completed patient treatments. In at least one embodiment, at least one computer program can operate within a server, which can be capable of analyzing patient data and identifying at least one diagnosis of an orthodontic condition (e.g., based on the information derived from textbooks and scientific literature, dynamic results derived from ongoing and completed patient treatments, or combinations thereof). The methods and systems can comprise assigning a probability value to at least one diagnosis, wherein the probability value can represent a likelihood that a diagnosis is accurate. According to such embodiments, which are but some of many, the methods and systems can comprise instructing a computer program to identify at least one treatment approach, a corrective appliance, or a combination thereof for at least one diagnosis.

In at least one embodiment, a method for diagnosing and identifying a treatment for an orthodontic condition can include providing a server on which a centralized website is hosted, wherein the server is configured to receive patient data through the website, providing a database that comprises or has access to information derived from textbooks and scientific literature and dynamic results derived from ongoing and completed patient treatments, operating at least one computer program within the server, which is capable of analyzing the patient data and identifying at least one diagnosis of the orthodontic condition based on said information derived from textbooks and scientific literature and dynamic results derived from ongoing and completed patient treatments, assigning a probability value to the at least one diagnosis, wherein the probability value represents a likelihood that the diagnosis is accurate, and instructing the computer program to identify at least one treatment approach, a corrective appliance, or a combination thereof for the at least one diagnosis. A server can be configured to identify a location and position of a plurality of teeth in patient data in at least one of two-dimensional and three-dimensional space. A method can include assigning coordinates to one or more teeth within a plurality of teeth, wherein said coordinates can be correlated to a location and/or position of one or more teeth or portions thereof. A method can include comparing coordinates for teeth to a table contained within a database, such as a table that comprises a series of diagnostic data sets with each diagnostic data set comprising coordinates, or a range of coordinates, which can be correlated with a known location or position of a plurality of teeth and/or a previously diagnosed orthodontic condition, instructing a server to identify a diagnostic data set contained within a database, which can represent a statistical fit (e.g., best fit) or most closely resemble coordinates for one or more teeth of a patient, and instructing a server to diagnosis an orthodontic condition based on a diagnostic data set identified. A probability value can be assigned to at least one diagnosis based, at least in part, on a confidence level assigned to a diagnostic data set, such as a data set which a server can identify as a statistical best or other fit for coordinates for one or more teeth of a patient.

A method can include instructing a computer program to identify at least one treatment approach, a corrective appliance, or a combination thereof for at least one diagnosis, which can include instructing a server to calculate a set of target coordinates, which can represent a desired or corrected location or position of a tooth, and identifying at least one treatment approach, a corrective appliance, or a combination thereof, which can be at least partially effective to reorient one or more teeth toward a location or position represented by one or more target coordinates. A method can include instructing a server to calculate a probability value that can be correlated with a relative likelihood of at least one treatment approach, corrective appliance, or a combination thereof, being effective to reorient one or more teeth to a location or position represented by a target, and can include employing an application of at least one artificial intelligence or other algorithm. A method can include identifying at least one treatment approach, a corrective appliance, or a combination thereof for at least one diagnosis by employing an application of at least one artificial intelligence algorithm.

In at least one embodiment, a system for diagnosing and identifying a treatment for an orthodontic condition can include a server on which a centralized website is hosted, wherein the server is configured to receive patient data through the website, a database that comprises or has access to information derived from textbooks and scientific literature and dynamic results derived from ongoing and completed patient treatments, and at least one computer program housed within or accessible by the server, which is capable of analyzing the patient data and identifying at least one diagnosis of the orthodontic condition based on said information derived from textbooks and scientific literature and dynamic results derived from ongoing and completed patient treatments, wherein the server can be adapted for assigning a probability value to the at least one diagnosis, wherein the probability value represents a likelihood that the diagnosis is accurate, and instructing the computer program to identify at least one treatment approach, a corrective appliance, or a combination thereof for the at least one diagnosis. A server can be configured to identify a location or position of a plurality of teeth in patient data in at least one of two-dimensional and three-dimensional space, and can be configured to assign coordinates to one or more teeth, such as coordinates that can be correlated to a location or position of each tooth. A server can be configured to compare coordinates for one or more teeth to a table contained within a database, wherein the table can comprise a series of diagnostic data sets, such as one or more diagnostic data sets comprising coordinates, or a range of coordinates, which can be correlated with a known location or position of one or more teeth or a previously or otherwise diagnosed orthodontic condition. A server can be configured to identify a diagnostic data set contained within a database, which can represent a statistical best fit, or most closely resemble, coordinates for one or more teeth of a patient, and to diagnose an orthodontic condition based on a diagnostic data set.

A system can include a probability value assigned to at least one diagnosis, which can be based, at least in part, on a confidence level assigned to a diagnostic data set, such as a data set which the server can identify as a statistical best fit for the coordinates for one or more teeth, such as one or more teeth of a plurality of teeth of a patient. A system can include a computer program adapted to identify at least one treatment approach, a corrective appliance, or a combination thereof for at least one diagnosis, which can include instructing a server to calculate a set of target coordinates, which can represent a desired or corrected location or position of one or more teeth, and identify at least one treatment approach, a corrective appliance, or a combination thereof, which can be at least partially effective to reorient one or more teeth toward a location or position represented by one or more target coordinates. A server can be configured to calculate a probability value that can be correlated with a relative likelihood of at least one treatment approach, corrective appliance, or a combination thereof, being effective to reorient one or more teeth to a location or position represented by target coordinates. A server can be configured to employ at least one artificial intelligence or other algorithm when identifying at least one diagnosis of an orthodontic condition and/or when identifying at least one treatment approach, a corrective appliance, or a combination thereof for at least one diagnosis.

Although illustrative embodiments of the present invention have been described herein, it should be understood that the invention is not limited to those described, and that various other changes or modifications may be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for delivering a diagnosis and identification of a treatment for an orthodontic condition, comprising: providing a graphical user interface that prompts a user for electronic patient data regarding the orthodontic condition; providing access, through the graphical user interface, to a database that comprises or has access to information derived from patient treatments, the information derived from patient treatments including an electronically stored data set for each patient treatment, wherein each data set includes data that represents at least one of (a) a location and position of one or more teeth subject of a corresponding patient treatment and (b) a previously diagnosed orthodontic condition for the corresponding patient treatment; comparing coordinates that represent at least two anatomic features of a set of teeth to at least a portion of the information derived from patient treatments accessible via the database; identifying a best fit data set that represents a statistical or prioritized best fit for the coordinates; identifying at least one diagnosis of the orthodontic condition by prioritizing at least a portion of the data from a plurality of the data sets; and delivering an electronic treatment model of the orthodontic condition that provides to the user one or more of (a) a diagnosis, (b) the diagnosis along with a probability value representing a likelihood the diagnosis is accurate, and (c) a plurality of diagnoses along with a plurality of probability values.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of probability values represents a likelihood that a corresponding one of the plurality of diagnoses is accurate.
 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising identifying at least one treatment regimen for the at least one diagnosis by prioritizing at least a portion of the data from a plurality of the data sets, and delivering an electronic treatment model of the orthodontic condition that provides to the user one or more of (a) a treatment regimen, (b) the treatment regimen along with a probability value representing a likelihood the treatment regimen is accurate, and (c) a plurality of treatment regimens along with a plurality of probability values.
 4. The method of claim 3, wherein each of the plurality of probability values represents a likelihood that a corresponding one of the plurality of treatment regimens is accurate.
 5. The method of claim 3, wherein the at least one treatment regimen for the at least one diagnosis includes at least one of a treatment approach, a corrective appliance and a combination thereof.
 6. The method of claim 3, further comprising outputting to the user a plurality of treatment regimens along with a plurality of probability values, wherein each of the plurality of probability values represents a relative likelihood that a corresponding one of the potential treatment regimens will be effective to reorient one or more teeth of the set of teeth represented in the electronic treatment model, and wherein the plurality of treatment regimens include at least one of interproximal tooth reduction, tooth extraction, tooth restoration and a combination thereof.
 7. The method of claim 3, wherein the information derived from patient treatments includes data representing treatment time for one or more patient treatments and the method further comprises outputting to the user at least one of an estimated treatment time and an average treatment time for the at least one treatment regimen.
 8. The method of claim 3, wherein at least one of the at least one diagnosis and the at least one treatment regimen is the same as that for a patient treatment corresponding to the best fit data set.
 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising prompting the user to tag one or more of the at least two anatomic features with an electronic identifier.
 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising outputting to the user a malocclusion classification for the orthodontic condition along with a probability value representing a likelihood the malocclusion classification is accurate.
 11. The method of claim 1, further comprising aligning the at least two anatomic features based on a pattern representing a target orthodontic condition, wherein the target orthodontic condition is at least one of an ideal condition, an acceptable condition based on a consensus of previously successful patient treatments and a combination thereof.
 12. The method of claim 1, further comprising aligning the at least two anatomic features at least one of: along a curve, along a spline, relative to one or more additional anatomic features of a set of teeth, and a combination thereof.
 13. The method of claim 1, wherein a first of the at least two anatomic features is on a first arch and a second of the at least two anatomic features is on a second arch, the method further comprising aligning the first anatomic feature on the first arch relative to the second anatomic feature on the second arch.
 14. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing the graphical user interface via a wireless interface.
 15. The method of claim 1, further comprising wherein the database comprises or has access to patient treatment information derived from at least one of textbooks, scientific literature, results derived from ongoing patient treatments, results derived from completed patient treatments, and a combination thereof.
 16. The method of claim 1, further comprising wherein the coordinates that represent the at least two anatomic features of a set of teeth are three-dimensional coordinates.
 17. An orthodontic diagnostic and treatment system, comprising: a data interface configured to access information derived from patient treatments, the information derived from patient treatments including an electronically stored data set for each of a plurality of patient treatments, wherein each data set includes data that represents at least one of (a) a location and position of one or more teeth subject of a corresponding patient treatment, (b) a previously diagnosed orthodontic condition for the corresponding patient treatment, and (c) an electronic treatment model of the orthodontic condition that includes coordinates that represent at least two anatomic features of a set of teeth; and a management node configured to receive electronic patient data of a user and to retrieve information derived from patient treatments through the data interface, the management node including means for comparing coordinates of the electronic patient data of the user to at least a portion of the information derived from patient treatments, for identifying a best fit data set that represents a statistical or prioritized best fit for the coordinates, for identifying at least one diagnosis of an orthodontic condition by prioritizing at least a portion of the data from a plurality of the data sets, and for outputting to the user one or more of (a) a diagnosis, (b) the diagnosis along with a probability value representing a likelihood the diagnosis is accurate, and (c) a plurality of diagnoses along with a plurality of probability values, wherein each of the plurality of probability values represents a likelihood that a corresponding one of the plurality of diagnoses is accurate.
 18. The system of claim 17, further comprising means for identifying at least one treatment regimen for the at least one diagnosis by prioritizing at least a portion of the data from a plurality of the data sets, and for outputting to the user one or more of (a) a treatment regimen, (b) the treatment regimen along with a probability value representing a likelihood the treatment regimen is accurate, and (c) a plurality of treatment regimens along with a plurality of probability values, wherein each of the plurality of probability values represents a likelihood that a corresponding one of the plurality of treatment regimens is accurate.
 19. The system of claim 18, wherein the at least one treatment regimen for the at least one diagnosis includes at least one of a treatment approach, a corrective appliance and a combination thereof.
 20. The system of claim 17, further comprising wherein the coordinates of the electronic patient data of the user are three-dimensional coordinates. 